Search- is interface the new battleground?
Posted by Jeffrey on Feb 19, 2008
You type in your word combos into the box and hope and pray that something relevant comes back in the first 10 entries on the page. Or you can repeat with a slightly different boolean combo. And still hope and pray…
But maybe its not simply in the initial search terms that determine how successful the search for information will be. Maybe if we acknowledge that its really really hard to get back the results we want on the first try, that the way to develop a better search experience is how you engage with the results to refine that search.
That’s why I was interested in Quintura and more recently in silobreaker.com. In each case they look at related items in a search visually in order to expose connections to the key search term. Don’t think an item is related? Just get rid of it either by clicking the ‘x’ or in the case of silobreaker, dragging it to the trash.
It makes refining the search more intuitive but also exposes linkages between items by proximity and size. Which helps you understand what the internet google Quintura/Silobreaker thinks of you.
Note: Another visual search engine was launched in Beta called SearchMe. Techcrunch covers it here

Jeffrey
some additional search engine options for your readers to consider
For those interested Charles Knight
has outlined 100 alternative search engines that are specailized, some that ‘think’(ChaCha) , listen, present information in a quasi 3-d realm (Kartoo/Quintura), make recommendations and even speak (speegle) - talk about an engaging ’search experience!
(http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_100_alternative_search_engines.php)
Cheers
Miro
Jeffrey, you can also embed Quintura search engine onto your blog like a widget by clicking Embed it! on www.quintura.com